PM Modi highlighted the broader plans for improving infrastructure in J&K. Some of the key projects include:
During the event, Jammu & Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah raised the issue of restoring Statehood to J&K, referring to the Prime Minister’s previous promises.
Background |
Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) was granted special status under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, which provided it with its own constitution, flag, and administrative autonomy. This allowed J&K to govern many of its internal affairs independently. |
|
Reorganization of Jammu and Kashmir (2019) |
On August 5, 2019, the Indian government revoked Article 370, ending J&K’s special status. In its place, the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganization Act was passed, dividing the state into two Union Territories: |
|
Jammu and Kashmir (Union Territory) |
J&K became a Union Territory with a Legislative Assembly. |
|
Ladakh (Union Territory) |
Ladakh became a Union Territory without a Legislative Assembly. |
|
Current Administration |
- J&K is now governed under Article 239 (applicable to Union Territories). - The Jammu and Kashmir High Court serves as the high court for both J&K and Ladakh. |
|
Representation in Parliament |
- Jammu and Kashmir has 5 Lok Sabha seats and 4 Rajya Sabha seats. - Ladakh has 1 Lok Sabha seat. |
|
Demand for Statehood in Jammu and Kashmir |
||
Political Parties’ Demand |
National Conference (NC) and other political parties in J&K are demanding the restoration of Statehood to the region. They point to the Centre's promise that J&K, after being downgraded to a Union Territory in August 2019, would eventually regain its Statehood. |
|
Reason for Demand |
Political parties and activists believe that restoring full statehood will: - Strengthen local governance and democracy. - Recognize the region's distinct cultural and political identity. - Ensure better self-governance and decision-making power. |
|
|
They are concerned that the Union Territory status limits the ability of J&K’s people to make decisions independently, undermines public trust, and erodes local democratic structures. |
|
Concerns Over Union Territory Status |
Proponents of statehood argue that continuing as a Union Territory: - Limits local autonomy. - Affects the decision-making process of the region. - Leads to a sense of alienation and may foster instability. |
|
Formation of New States |
Article 3 of the Indian Constitution grants Parliament the power to create new states or Union Territories. The article allows the government to: - Unite two or more states. - Separate areas from existing states. - Alter the boundaries or name of any state. |
|
Article 3 Details |
- Parliament can create, change boundaries, or change the name of a state. - Changes can also involve uniting two or more states or dividing an existing state. |
|
Process of Forming New States |
A bill to create new states or Union Territories can only be introduced in Parliament with the President’s recommendation. - If the bill affects an existing state’s areas, boundaries, or name, it must be referred to the State Legislature for review (non-binding). |
|
Simple Majority in Parliament |
Laws passed under Article 3 do not require a constitutional amendment. They can be enacted with a simple majority in Parliament. |
|
Challenges in Restoring Statehood |
|
|
Also Read |
|
FREE NIOS Books | |