Hashimpura Massacre Convicts Challenge Delhi Prison Rule on Furlough

Hashimpura Massacre Convicts Challenge Delhi Prison Rule on Furlough

24-03-2025
  1. The convicts of the 1987 Hashimpura massacre have moved the Delhi High Court challenging a Delhi Prison Rule that vests the power to grant furlough with the court where their appeal is pending.
  • On May 22, 1987, Provincial Armed Constabulary (PAC) personnel allegedly killed around 38 Muslim men in Hashimpura, Meerut (Uttar Pradesh) amid communal tensions.
  1. The convicts argue that furloughs, generally granted by the executive, should not be left to the appellate court handling their conviction appeal

 

Difference between Furlough, Parole, Bail
 

Aspect

Furlough

Parole

Bail

Definition

Short-term, temporary release from prison granted to convicts as part of a reformative approach, without a specific emergency reason.

Conditional release of a convict before completion of sentence, on the basis of good conduct and specific emergency needs.

Temporary release of an accused person (not yet convicted), to ensure their presence during trial, granted by judicial authority.

Nature of Sentence

Sentence continues to run during furlough.

  • For example, if a convict is serving a 10-year sentence and is released on furlough for 30 days, they still complete the sentence in 10 years.

Sentence is suspended during parole.

  • For example, in a 10-year sentence, if parole is granted for 30 days, the sentence period gets extended by 30 days.

No sentence involved — person is not yet convicted. The person remains free while facing trial.

Purpose

  • Break monotony of imprisonment.
  • Encourage discipline and good behavior.
  • Help prisoner maintain family/social ties.
  • Psychological reform of long-term inmates.
  • Relief in exigencies like death in family, illness, marriage, harvest season, or legal appeal.
  • Rehabilitation of prisoners.
  • Ensure accused attends court proceedings.
  • Protect liberty of individuals during trial.

Granting Authority

  • Deputy Inspector General (DIG) of Prisons under Prison Rules.
  • However, Delhi Prison Rules, 2018, Note 2 of Rule 1224: If appeal is pending before High Court, furlough must be sought from court, not executive.
  • Divisional Commissioner or Prison Authorities, depending on jurisdiction.
  • Judicial Magistrate or Court, under Section 479–511 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 (replacing CrPC).

Eligibility

  • Long-term convicts with good conduct.
  • Not available to those convicted under serious crimes like UAPA, organized crime, terrorism, or repeat offenses.
  • Convicts with good behavior;
    Considered only in emergent situations.
    Not granted to convicts of heinous crimes like rape or murder.
  • Available to most accused, except those charged under BNS serious offences, or if deemed flight risk or threat to society.

Conditions

  • Return to prison on time.
  • May be subject to reporting to local police or movement restrictions.
  • May be denied in interest of society/public order.
  • Must follow rules of conduct during parole period.
  • Regular police reporting, movement restrictions.
  • Violations can lead to cancellation and re-arrest.
  • Must comply with court conditions: surety bond, police reporting, restricted movement, surrendering passport, etc.

Duration & Frequency

  • Limited, short-term, often 14–30 days, extendable.
  • Can be granted once or twice a year, depending on jail manual.
  • Generally longer duration than furlough, can be granted multiple times, depending on conduct and reason.
  • Duration lasts till trial ends or bail is revoked.
  • Bail types: interim, regular, anticipatory.

Requirement of Reason

No specific reason required.

  • Granted as part of reform policy.
  • Can be denied for public safety.
  • Specific reason mandatory (e.g., funeral, illness, sowing/harvesting, marriage, exam, SC appeal).
  • Bail is granted based on judicial discretion, legal provisions, and nature of offence.

Legal Nature

  • Administrative decision under prison rules or Delhi Prison Rules 2018.
  • Mix of administrative and legal discretion.
  • Purely judicial process, governed by BNSS 2023 (Sections 479–511).

Relevant Constitutional Provisions

  • Tested against Article 14 (Right to Equality) and Article 21 (Right to Life and Liberty).
  • Also tested on Article 14 and 21, especially in cases of denial despite good conduct.
  • Protected under Article 21 — liberty of individuals is fundamental unless proven guilty.

 

Delhi Prison Rules 2018 and the Legal Challenge
 

What Do the Rules Say?
 

  1. Chapter XIX of Delhi Prison Rules (2018) deals with parole and furlough.
  2. Note 2 of Rule 1224 states that if an appeal against conviction is pending before the High Court or the time for filing such an appeal has not expired, furlough will not be granted by the executive.
  3. The convict must seek appropriate directions from the appellate court.
     

What Is Being Challenged?
 

  1. The constitutional validity of Note 2 of Rule 1224 is under challenge before the Delhi High Court (HC).
  2. The petitioners argue that:
    1. The rule violates Articles 14 (Right to Equality) and 21 (Right to Life and Liberty).
    2. It contradicts the reformative approach of imprisonment by denying furlough despite good conduct.
    3. The jurisprudence of parole should also apply to furlough, as furlough does not involve suspension of sentence.
       

How Has the Delhi High Court Interpreted the Rule So Far?
 

  1. A Single Judge Bench of the Delhi HC ruled that the term "High Court" in the rule implies the appellate court, which includes both Delhi HC and the Supreme Court (SC).
  2. If a convict’s appeal is pending before the SC, only the Supreme Court can grant furlough.
  3. A Division Bench of Delhi HC is now examining whether:
    1. An application seeking furlough can be made before the High Court, even if the appeal is before the Supreme Court.
    2. The constitutional validity of the prison rule is justified.

 

Judicial Precedents on Suspension of Sentence
 

Landmark Case: K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra (1959):
 

  1. Kawas Manekshaw Nanavati, a naval officer, was convicted of murder in 1959.
  2. The then Governor suspended his sentence under Article 161, even before appeal was filed in the Supreme Court.
  3. In 1960, the Supreme Court ruled that Governor cannot suspend sentence once the matter is sub judice before SC, as it would interfere with the Court’s appellate powers.
  4. This precedent supports the idea that only appellate courts can grant relief when appeal is pending.
     

Is It Common to Deny Furlough During Appeal?
 

  1. Yes, this is a common practice in many states.
  2. In 2023, National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) submitted before the SC that:
  1. Several states deny parole/furlough if an appeal is pending.
  2. The logic is that courts can grant necessary relief, not the executive.
  1. Senior advocate Gaurav Agarwal, representing NALSA, clarified that:
  1. Parole and furlough are distinct from suspension of sentence or interim bail.
  2. While courts can grant bail, only the state executive grants parole/furlough under prison rules.

 

The outcome of this case will have a broader impact on: Prisoner rights, Scope of executive discretion and Reformative principles in Indian criminal justice. The Delhi High Court’s final verdict will shape how furloughs are interpreted and granted in the future — not just in Delhi but across other jurisdictions.
 

Also Read

FREE NIOS Books

UPSC Daily Current Affairs

UPSC Monthly Magazine

Previous Year Interview Questions

Free MCQs for UPSC Prelims

UPSC Test Series

ENSURE IAS NOTES

Our Booklist

 

What is Mosura Fentoni?

India-Germany Strategic Partnership: Silver Jubilee

How India’s Coastline Lengthened Without Gaining New Land