Centre-State Financial Devolution

Context
 

Recent reports from indicate that the Union Government is proposing a reduction in the States’ share of the divisible pool of taxes from the current 41% to 40%. This change, may reduce States’ annual revenue by approximately ₹350 billion (₹35,000 crore).
 

Introduction
 

Fiscal federalism in India determines the financial relationship between the Union and State governments. The Indian Constitution lays down the framework for tax collection and revenue distribution, ensuring that financial resources are allocated equitably. However, there are frequent disputes between the Centre and States regarding fund allocation, revenue-sharing mechanisms, and tax devolution, particularly in light of GST implementation and cess and surcharge levies by the Centre.
 

Constitutional Provisions Governing Fiscal Federalism
 

The Indian Constitution provides a structured framework for revenue-sharing between the Centre and States:
 

1. Articles Governing Tax Distribution
 

Article	Provision
Article 268	Duties levied by the Centre but collected and appropriated by the States (e.g., stamp duty).
Article 269	Taxes levied and collected by the Centre but assigned to the States (e.g., inter-state trade taxes).
Article 270	Distribution of taxes between the Centre and States (e.g., Income Tax, GST).
Article 271	States do not receive a share of surcharges and cesses levied by the Centre.
Article 275	Provides grants-in-aid from the Centre to certain States.
Article 280	Mandates the appointment of a Finance Commission every five years to recommend the distribution of tax revenues.

 

2. Seventh Schedule: Division of Taxation Powers
 

 

List	Taxation Power
Union List	Taxes levied exclusively by the Centre (e.g., Income Tax, GST on inter-state trade, Customs Duties).
State List	Taxes under the jurisdiction of the State (e.g., State Excise, Stamp Duty, Land Revenue).
Concurrent List	Laws made by both Centre and States, but taxation power rests mainly with the Centre.

 

The Role of Finance Commissions: 15th and 16th
 

Finance Commission
 

• The Finance Commission (FC) is a constitutional body that decides how tax revenues should be shared between the Union and States.
• Every 5 years President appoints the FC on the recommendation of the Centre, but it is an independent body.
• It consists of a chairman and four other members who are appointed by the President.
• The Finance Commission (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1951, has specified the qualifications for chairman and other members of the commission.
• The Union government has notified the constitution of the 16th Finance Commission under the chairmanship of Dr. Arvind Panagariya for making its recommendations for the period of 2026-31.
   

15th Finance Commission (2020–2025)
 

Key Features	Details
Chairperson	N.K. Singh
Vertical Devolution	States receive 41% of the divisible pool (a reduction from 42% after J&K’s reorganization).
Horizontal Devolution Criteria	Population (2011 Census - 15%), Income Distance (45%), Area (15%), Forest & Ecology (10%), Tax Effort (2.5%), Demographic Performance (12.5%).
Special Grants	Specific grants for health, education, and disaster risk management.

 

16th Finance Commission (2026–2031)
 

• Chairperson: Dr. Arvind Panagariya
   
• Mandate:
  • Review tax devolution, particularly proposals to reduce States' share to 40%.
  • Evaluate grants-in-aid to States and local bodies.
  • Recommend funding mechanisms for disaster relief.
     

Binding Recommendations:
 

• The Finance Commission’s recommendations are binding, meaning that once implemented, they cannot be changed arbitrarily by the Union Government.

Horizontal Devolution: Criteria for Tax Distribution Among States

Successive Finance Commissions have modified the formula for horizontal devolution to better reflect fiscal realities. The following table provides an overview of the evolution of criteria:
 

 

For 15^th FC

Income distance: distance of a State’s income from the State with highest per capita income (States with lower per capita income -given a higher share to maintain equity among States.)
 

Population: population as per the 2011 Census

Forest and ecology: share of dense forest of each State

Tax effort: used to reward States with higher tax collection efficiency.
 

Sources of revenue for the centre and states
 

Centre’s Revenue Sources

• Direct Taxes:
  • Income Tax
  • Corporate Tax (not shared with States)
     
• Indirect Taxes:
  • GST on inter-state trade (IGST)
  • Customs Duties
  • Excise Duties on Petroleum and Tobacco
     
• Non-Tax Revenues:
  • PSU Profits
  • Dividends from RBI and Public Sector Enterprises
  • Spectrum Sales and Licensing Fees
     

States’ Revenue
 

• State GST (SGST)
• State Excise (Alcohol)
• Stamp Duty & Registration Fees
• Mining Royalties, Lotteries, and Land Revenue
   

Current Issues in Centre-State Financial Relations
 

Reduction in States’ Share
 

• Proposal: Cut tax devolution from 41% to 40%.
• Impact: Could lead to ₹350 billion revenue loss for States.
   

Rising Share of Cesses & Surcharges (Article 271)
 

• Non-Devolvable Revenue: Cesses and surcharges (around 23% of its gross tax receipts for 2024-25. )are fully retained by the Centre.
• Impact: The divisible pool shrinks, reducing States’ funds.

GST Compensation Issues
 

• Delayed Payments: Many States struggled to receive their due compensation after the GST compensation period ended in June 2022.
• Demand for Extension: Some States are calling for permanent GST revenue-sharing mechanisms.
   

Declining Share for Southern States
 

• Issue: Southern States (e.g., Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka) receive lesser allocations due to low population growth (2011 Census data).

• Impact: States that have controlled population growth are effectively penalized.
   

Variation in Grants-in-Aid Across States
 

• Grants-in-aid recommended by the Finance Commission (FC) differ across States based on specific fiscal needs. (E.g. Revenue Deficit Grants ,Sector-Specific Grants ,State-Specific Grants ,Local Body Grants )
   

Disparities in Tax Contributions and Returns
 

• Industrially developed States (e.g., Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka) receive significantly less in return compared to what they contribute in central taxes.
   
• Reasons:
  • Income Distance Formula: Lower-income States receive higher devolution.
  • Corporate Taxation Structure: Taxes are remitted in State capitals where companies are headquartered, skewing revenue distribution.
     

Way Forward
 

1. Expanding the Divisible Pool
 

• Include a portion of cesses & surcharges to provide a larger share to States.
   

2. Enhancing State Fiscal Autonomy

• Allow greater taxation power for States on new revenue streams.
   

3. Reforming Devolution Criteria

• Increase weightage for fiscal effort and GST contributions.
   

4. Institutionalizing Intergovernmental Consultations

• Regular Centre-State fiscal dialogues through an Empowered Committee.
   

5. Addressing Regional Disparities

• Targeted Grants: Funding should reward efficient States while supporting lagging ones.
   

Conclusion
 

The Centre-State tax division is a pillar of India’s fiscal federalism. While the Finance Commissions ensure equitable revenue-sharing, challenges such as rising cess collections, GST compensation delays, and declining State autonomy persist.

To maintain economic stability, India must modernize its tax-sharing model to promote fiscal autonomy, transparency, and balanced regional development.