The arrest of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has raised questions over his ability to continue performing his role while in judicial custody.
a. He loses the majority in the Legislative Assembly
b. His party asks him to step down
c. He resigns from his position
According to Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, conviction is a pre-condition for disqualification from holding public office. Since Kejriwal has not been convicted, he can legally continue in office.
Difficulty in Governing from Prison: Governing from prison presents practical challenges. Kejriwal will have to lead cabinet meetings, consult with colleagues and review minutes for approval. However, being in prison would subject him to prison rules, making it difficult to perform these tasks effectively.
Manoj Narula versus Union of India: In the case of Manoj Narula v. Union of India, the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of constitutional morality, good governance and constitutional trust in holding public office. The decision suggests that ethical considerations may play a role in determining whether Kejriwal can remain chief minister while in jail.
The legal and practical implications of Arvind Kejriwal's arrest and subsequent judicial custody need to be carefully considered. Although there are no constitutional or legal provisions that explicitly bar him from remaining chief minister, the practical challenges of governing from prison and principles of constitutional morality may influence the decision.